I was on Wikipedia and saw this map and I liked it, and then I thought to myself, “you know who else probably likes maps?”
Yehr, time for maps!
I was on Wikipedia and saw this map and I liked it, and then I thought to myself, “you know who else probably likes maps?”
Yehr, time for maps!
What if we get… fictional ?
I love maps, but I can’t think of any cool ones to mention rn so I just thought “Hey, you know what, there are some cool fictional ones, and you been playing Skyrim lately so Tamriel ”
I used to draw simple maps for fantasy worlds I would build for fun. I’m not sure where they got to though, everything got shuffled around in the move unfortunately.
Something neat about current ocean floor maps that look like this:
These current ocean floor maps aren’t 100% accurate because these maps are made by mapping the ocean surface! Through a technic that involves measuring changes in the ocean surface caused by increases or decreases in the mass of the sea floor which cause more or less gravitation pull on the surrounding water.
The current accurate ocean floor map looks more like this:
This is an image by a project called ‘Seabed 2030’ that aims to map and collect data to have a completed ocean floor map by 2030.
Hooray I love maps!
I love the bit on projections, it is really interesting the ways in how a map is presented can lead us to bias. So it can be very helpful to present a familiar map in very different ways, such as flipping it upside-down, as often it can help you see things in a new way and get new insights out of a familiar map you otherwise wouldn’t.
This is helpful to me as sometimes at my work I have to create maps so I can figure things out or show info to others. I wish I could show some but I’m probably very not allowed. Maybe I can dig around for one I made back when I doing research work.
Fun fact, the physical surface of the earth and gravitational surface don’t exactly align, this has big implications in surveying. Mainly for drainage of large scale land developments, such as long remote roads. Water doesn’t necessarily go downhill, it follows gravity, so if a drainage system is built off measurements of the physical ground not adjusted with a gravity model, things might not work as expected.
It’s a whole thing in the surveying world at the moment of deciding whether to move from the traditional surface measured height datums to one derived from gravity measurements. Least it is in Australia, I think some other parts of the world have made more progress in that area. It’s all very interesting, I only kind of understand it cus I’m just a mathematician cosplaying as a surveyor.
That's interesting, I knew about the gravitational surface being different then the actual surface. I didn't know it effects drainage like that but it makes a lot of sense.
'mathematician cosplaying as a surveyor' xD That's how I feel with a lot of things. I work in the medical field right now with an Oceanography degree. A lot people that work with me have medical field careers going or starting. I had approximant knowledge going to the job and I've pick up a lot of things. I'm just pretending to be one of them. :)
Such a pretty map!
Amazing map!
Here’s a map I made using the rice method, where you dump a bunch of rice (or beans) on a paper/poster board and trace around them!
Here is the basic outline I ended up with:
And this is fleshing it out in Inkarnate! It’s still a big wip but I haven’t had the energy to fiddle with it lately. ;-;
Ooooh yes looking at these sort of video game maps as a kid used to fill me with such wonder
A cool and detailed map with some fun annotations. You’ll need to zoom in to really see it
I’ll be estatic if anyone recognises what its for, guesses are welcome too
Verry cool erosion patterns on that river system
It looks like your planing a hike as the faint red line follows tracks
Using the map scale, I very roughly say that’s like a 15km hike?
My first thought is the Grand Canyon because It looks like a canyon from the map. I’ve never been to the Grand Canyon. I relate a canyon to something popular here in the US because I’m from the US. I think the Grand Canyon is probably is steeper but I’m not sure.
Oh this is such a good map! Is it for some kind of orienteering sport?
Like I’m guessing you start at the triangle and use a defined set of tools to try to reach as many of the circles as possible! Hence the water point and the out of bounds areas.
Yeah it was a spectacular valley, a the line created with the dying highlighter is indeed where we planned to go
As spectacular as the valley was, it was no Grand Canyon, even if my legs afterwards felt like it was.
Very close! It’s a map for Rogaining, sport very similar to orienteering. It has a lot in common, navigation by map and compass only, you are only given the map right before the event starts, no electronic aids, finding control points, but they diverge in some key areas.
The biggest difference is in orienteering the goal is navigate to a list of control points in a specified order in the fastest time possible, while Rogaining instead specifies a time limit, gives each control point a point value, and the aim is to have the highest score at the end. Courses are purposely designed so that no matter how good you are you can’t reach even close to every control in the time period. The other big differences are duration, orienteering is more akin to long distance running, no more than 2 hours in the longest format, whereas the classic Rogines are more akin to hiking, the longest format being a whole 24 hours. The final key difference is Rogaining is a team sport, with teams of 2 to 5 members, I think out of safety due to the long event times and isolation of locations.
So this is the map I used for an 8 hour Rogaine! I haven’t done any longer ones yet, still working up to that. The red line was our planned route, the black circle was also out of bounds unexpectantly due to a fire going through there right before the event, which had the unfortunate effect of simplifying the planning process a bit. The control are with the points of in the tens of what their number is, so control 41 and 44 are both worth 40 points, the second number is just so you can tell them apart.
How did we come up with the plan to draw the map? We pinned the map to a cork board, stuck pins in every control point and used a string with to scale markings on it for every kilometer so we could test the distance of potential routes easily even with lots of curves. Then its a planning game of trying to optimize a route to collect most points for the distance you think you can cover in the time. A picture from the internet to illustrate:
OOF that was a lot of words, if you made through it or even if you didn’t, you deserve another map.
This is a GPS recording of where we actually ended up going:
I could go on about this for a lot longer but I feel I’m already stretching the relevancy of this thread a bit, so I’ll settle for quickly rattling off the coolest things about it.
I don't drink tea, but if I did, this would definitely be in my cup of it.
This activity is a perfect rogaining hiker? problem to relax/study combinatorics to. I want so badly to slap a slime mold on that map and let it go to town.
I think my actual strategy would be to mark a string at the distance (or make a loop) corresponding to what I confidently think I could cover in the allotted time and wrap as many points as I can, so it's abstracted to a puzzle game, independent of the whole activity. Even then, it'd more more than hard; it'd be np-hard. Makes sense a math nerd would be into it. Might just be a hunch, but I suspect you enjoy maths that take lots of time.
instead of making multiple posts back to back, I'm just going to append this for my fellow dirt connoisseurs